|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
OA-1
 |
Work with Congress and stakeholders toward enactment of the Plant Protection Act, as introduced in the 106th Congress as H.R. 1504 and S. 910. |
A |
X(E-1, D-11) | 3/17/00 | N/A | 4/6/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
|
OA-2
|
Show leadership in acceptance of the revised text of the IPPC by encouraging official notification of acceptance to the FAO by the U.S. Department of State. |
L |
X | 9/1/02 | N/A | 10/02 | 11/02 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
OA-3
|
Take a leadership role in implementation of the SPS Agreement. With regard to the upcoming round of WTO negotiations, the SPS Agreement specifically should not be reopened. The existing text represents a delicate balance of rights and obligations which, as interpreted so far, is consistent with pest safeguarding goals and a science-based approach for assessing and managing pest risks. |
L |
X (OA-4) | 9/1/02 | N/A | 10/02 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
OA-4
|
Set an international example through a commitment to continually improve the safeguarding system, providing a leadership precedent for other countries. |
L |
X | 9/1/02 | N/A | 10/02 | 11/02 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
OA-5
|
Participate fully in the implementation of the Executive Order on Invasive Species. |
L |
X(E-12) | 9/1/02 | N/A | 10/02 | 11/02 | 11/2/03 | 11/16/03 |
|
OA-6
|
Provide the resources necessary to continuously develop a thorough and relevant knowledge base for pest risk evaluations, one that upgrades its scientific literature and its pest interception database. Make continuous improvement a core value for risk analysis throughout the Agency. |
RA |
(OA-8, E-17) | N/A | N/A | 7/15/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/3/05 | 8/17 |
|
OA-7
|
Fund research on invasion biology. |
ST |
X | 6/22/01 | N/A | 6/22/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
OA-8
|
Prioritize and provide adequate staffing for pest risk analysis activities and upgrade the education, training and tools of the risk analysis staff to enable continuous improvement of the risk analysis models. |
RA |
(OA-6, E-17) | N/A | N/A | 7/15/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/3/05 | 8/17 |
|
OA-9
|
Continually educate and communicate with PPQ staff on the importance and need for risk-based decisionmaking. |
RA |
X | 2/23/01 | 2/23/01 | 6/8/01 Revised 3/15/03 | Transferred to DHS | 8/7/03 | |
|
OA-10
|
Revise funding and staffing allocation guidelines for port operations based on information developed by risk analysis and management tools. |
S |
X(E 103, E-110) | 4/10/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/10/00 Revised 6/26/00 | 9/16/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
| OA-11 | Incorporate stakeholder collaboration and scientific consultation into its risk assessment development process. With stakeholder consultation, identify issues and develop timeframes for completion of rule development, and models for risk communication. |
RA |
(OA59) | N/A | 5/30/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21/05 | 7/5 | |
|
OA-12
|
Select and assemble a leadership coalition of 20 to 50 staff representing all levels of the organization that will report directly to the deputy administrator, to revise or clarify the mission, vision, and then identify the values associated with the mission. Then submit their findings to all employees for approval and acceptance. |
L |
X(OA 13,14, 15, 16, 17) | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/21/00 | 6/12/00 | 6/26 |
|
OA-13
|
Identify education sources and, where necessary, begin retraining the Agency in the development of mission, vision, and value statements. |
L |
X(OA 12, OA 14, 15, 16, 17) | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/21/00 | 6/12/00 | 6/26 |
|
OA-14
|
Recognize and celebrate past efforts at mission and vision development. |
L |
X(OA 12, 13, OA 15, 16, 17) | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/21/00 | 6/12/00 | 6/26 |
|
OA-15
|
Require the coalition to identify misalignments between the AgencyÆs mission, vision, and values, and to recommend how APHIS needs to address those misalignments. |
L |
X(OA 12, 13, 14, OA 16, 17) | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/21/00 | 6/12/00 | 6/26 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
OA-16
|
Identify Agency activities that directly fulfill the mission, then outsource, privatize, or otherwise reassign the remaining activities. |
L |
X(OA 12, 13, 14, 15, OA 17) | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/21/00 | 6/12/00 | 6/26 |
|
OA-17
|
Redesign the Agency structure to be self-organized, self-responsible, self-accountable. Make its structure compatible with the vision and remove unaligned structures that block needed action. |
L |
X(OA 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/21/00 | 6/12/00 | 6/26 |
|
OA-18
|
Create a learning agency by restoring employee training and education.. |
ED |
X (OA-21, 60, E-72, 104, 120, I-29, 36, P-17) | 3/24/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/1/00 | 2/15/01 Revised & expanded | 5/16/02 | 5/30 |
|
OA-19
|
Consider the establishment of learning contracts. |
ED |
X | 3/24/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/1/00 | 7/17/00 Resubmitted 2/27/01 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 |
| OA-20 | Base pay on performance and the development of mission related skill sets. |
L |
X | 6/22/01 | N/A | 6/22/01 | 10/24/01 | 11/7 | |
|
OA-21
|
Develop performance contracts that specify desired results, set guidelines, identify available resources, define accountability, and determine the consequences. |
ED |
X(OA-18, 60, E-72, 120, I-29, 36, P-17) | 2/15/01 | 2/15/01 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 | ||
|
OA-22
|
Use or expand the use of intern programs to provide additional sources and opportunities for management to find and evaluate potential permanent employees. |
S |
X | 4/10/00 | 4/10/00 | 4/10/00 Revised 6/10/00 | 9/16/00 | 11/20 | 12/4 |
| OA-23 | Expand the use of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act as another staffing source. |
S |
X | 4/10/00 | 4/10/00 | 4/10/00 Revised 6/10/00 | 9/16/00 | 11/21 | 12/5 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| OA-24 | Establish a stakeholder registry to facilitate communication with interested parties before and during critical decisionmaking. In the case of rulemaking, collaboration should be initiated before a proposed rule is developed. |
SC |
X(OA-25, 26, 28) | 10/13 | 10/2/00 | 2/12/01 | 2/27/01 | 8/23/02 | 9/6 |
| OA-25 | Open the registry to any organization or interest group in the U.S. interested in participating. |
SC |
X(OA-24, 26, 28) | 10/13 | 10/2/00 | 2/12/01 | 2/27/01 | 8/23/02 | 9/6 |
| OA-26 | Require stakeholders to provide a brief paragraph outlining the stakeholder organizationÆs interest and potential role in the delivery of pest safeguarding programs. |
SC |
X(OA-24, 25, 28) | 10/13 | 10/2/00 | Revised 2/12/01 | 2/27/01 | 8/23/02 | 9/6 |
| OA-27 | Establish a process and criteria for assigning "routine" or "non-routine" status to decisions subject to rulemaking, and a process for stakeholder collaboration under each, using the Australian approach as a guideline. |
A |
X | 10/1/00 | 10/3/00 | 5/1/02 | 6/27/02 | 7/11 | |
| OA-28 | Use modern technologies such as electronic notification and internet posting to notify and seek input from stakeholder registry participants on policy options and "nonroutine" decisions prior to initiating rulemaking. |
SC |
X(OA-24-26) | 10/13 | 10/2/00 | 2/12/01 | 2/27/01 | 8/23/02 | 9/6 |
| OA-29 | Encourage stakeholders to get more involved in identifying and reporting pests, and other activities that would benefit from a greater "field" presence. |
SC |
X | 9/00 | 10/5/00 | 10/6/00 | 1/6/02 | 1/25/02 | 2/8/02 |
|
OA-30
|
Strengthen and expand collaboration efforts with key Federal agencies with whom APHIS interacts, such as Customs Service. |
SC |
X | 6/19/00 | 6/19/00 | 7/12/05 | 7/26/05 | 8/1/05 | 8/15 |
|
OA-31
|
Seek opportunities to involve stakeholders in information-sharing activities such as situational briefings and cross-training. |
SC |
X | 10/6/00 | N/A | 10/6/00 | 5/23/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
OA-32
|
Establish an ongoing grant or other mechanism to support an operational structure to facilitate interaction and support between APHIS-PPQ and the National Plant Board. The resource commitment necessary to establish and maintain this structure should be shared between APHIS-PPQ and the National Plant Board under a cost-share formula. This structure would help to ensure a significant and predictable National Plant Board contribution toward mutual responsibilities associated with the detection and management of invasive pests. |
SC |
X | 6/7/00 | 6/7/00 | 6/20/00 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
OA-33
|
Explore mechanisms for constructive NPB involvement in key bilateral negotiations such as with Mexico and Canada. |
SC |
X | 6/7/00 | 5/24/00 | 6/20/00 | 5/23/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 |
|
OA-34
|
Base resource allocation on risk evaluations, and focus resources to guarantee greatest impact per investment dollar. |
RM |
X | 3/31/00 | 3/31/00 | 4/3/00 | 9/25/00 Resubmitted 2/27/01 transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 6/5/01 | 6/19 |
|
OA-35
|
Expand collection of user fees to support service delivery. |
UF |
X (E-7, 52) | 6/8/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/27/01 | ||
|
OA-36
|
Outsource, delegate, or pursue cost recovery for non-mandated activities that do not directly and measurably contribute to the safeguarding mission. |
S |
X | 4/10/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/10/00 Revised 6/30/00 | 9/16/00 | 11/29 | 12/14 |
|
OA-37
|
Pursue an increase in penalties that may be assessed for quarantine violations, and the assignment of penalties collected to support activities such as outreach and education or research and technology development. This will require statutory authority. |
CP |
X(OA 57, E 5,E 118, E 119, P 5) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/14/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
|
OA-38
|
Plan for strategic application of the AQI User Fee revenues, including any account reserve that may become available in FY 2003, to support critical program investments such as new technology implementation and offshore risk mitigation. |
UF |
N/A | N/A | 4/1/05 | 4/1/05 | 5/3/05 | 5/17 | |
| OA-39 | Advocate establishment of a no-year fund, to be replenished year to year, to fund emergency eradication efforts. This fund would be accessed at the discretion of the Secretary of Agriculture, given sufficient scientific basis for an achievable outcome. This fund would need to be adequately capitalized, and APHIS should be provided investment authority to properly maintain it. (Specific recommendaitons in Pest Detection and Response section) |
A |
X(D-21) | 1/31/01 | 1/31/01 | 2/12/01 Revised 4/05 | 4/1/05 | 5/3/05 | 5/17 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
OA-40
|
Establish a mechanism for determining research priorities within APHIS that includes representatives from the regions, International Services, headquarters staff, and stakeholders that are involved with the action programs. Stakeholders should include representatives from academic research institutions and industry. |
ST |
X(OA 41-44) | 4/13/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 Expanded & revised 6/23 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-41
|
As a component of the previous recommendation, adopt a specific project selection process that evaluates proposed research relevance to APHISÆ mission and resources. This process should allow for more objective project evaluation prior to NCPHST Board funding decisions. |
ST |
X(OA 40, 42-44 | 4/13/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 Expanded & revised 6/23/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-42
|
Expand the NCPHST Board of Directors to include a representative of ARS and, if feasible, additional stakeholders. |
ST |
X(OA 40, 41-44) | 4/13/00 | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 Expanded & revised 6/23/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-43
|
Develop cooperation between agencies within USDA, other Federal agencies, academic institutions, and industry research organizations to discuss the research priorities established by the Agency and determine the best course of action to meet the needs. |
ST |
X(OA 40-42, 44) | 4/13/00 | 4/17/00 | Expanded & revised 6/23/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-44
|
Formulate a comprehensive plan from the two steps outlined above to execute the necessary research programs. This plan should advantage of all available resources, including outside funding sources. APHIS should be the agency to hold the system accountable for meeting the research and technology development goals. |
ST |
X(OA 40-43) | 4/13/00 | 4/17/00 | Expanded & revised 6/23/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-45
|
Clearly define Methods DevelopmentÆs role in the safeguarding system to prevent the continuation of the competitive atmosphere that currently exists among USDA agencies. Many of the reviewers believe that Methods Development is a service agency function to the safeguarding system. |
L |
X(OA-46) | 9/25/00 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 5/17/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
OA-46
|
Restore funding levels and resource allocations to APHIS Methods Development to concentrate on their assigned task of putting useable tools in the hands of the action agencies. Implement a strategy in line with industry standards of allocating a percentage of the budget to research and technology development. |
L |
X(OA-45) | 9/25/00 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 5/17/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
OA-47
|
Encourage international cooperation and information sharing through participation in international technology development programs and seminars. Become more involved in providing leadership research environment to take advantage of knowledge gained in other areas of the world. |
ST |
X | 12/7/01 | 12/7/01 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
OA-48
|
Increase public information programs that focus on pest exclusion efforts such as "DonÆt Pack a Pest." Accomplish this by providing leadership in collaboration with state and industry organizations throughout the nation. |
PI/E |
X(OA 49-56, E 69- 70, P 14) | 4/19/00 | 3/30/00 | 6/26/00 Expanded | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-49
|
Develop classroom curriculum programs for K-12 that involve the pest risk message with eradication information. Examine the Ag-in-the-Classroom curriculum as a possible model. Also develop adult education programs to take the message to the traveling public and those buyers of smuggled products that do not meet quarantine standards. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48, 50-56, E-69-70, p-14) | 4/19/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/12/00 Expanded & Revised 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 Primarily transferred to CBP, 8/7/03 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-50
|
Develop public information programs to describe the detection programs throughout the nation. Focus on the positive aspects of trapping and early detection of infestations to point out the negative impacts of establishing new pest populations. This will make the trapping efforts more acceptable and encourage additional participants in the process. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48-49, 51-56, E 69-70, P-14) | 4/19/00 | N/A | 4/12/00 Expanded & Revised 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-51
|
Increase efforts in public information support and materials available to eradication programs through cooperative efforts with state and industry organizations in areas of high risk. Provide leadership to the development of collaborative programs in areas where negative eradication programs could occur. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48-50, 52-56, E 69-70, P14) | 4/19/00 | N/A | Expanded 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-52
|
Include information on the permits system in all public information programs. |
PI/E |
X (OA 48-51, 53-56, E 69-70, P 14) | 4/19/00 | N/A | Expanded 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-53
|
Focus on the societal benefits of pest safeguarding programs by capitalizing on the Invasive Species Executive Order. Incorporate this concept into all message development activities to present a consistent message from all sectors involved in public information and education. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48-52, 54-56, E 69-70, P 14) | 4/19/00 | N/A | 4/12/00 Expanded & Revised 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-54
|
Develop a public information campaign for the international data systems with the objective of utilizing private sector scientists to assist in the gathering of data. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48-53, 55-56, E 69-70, P 14) | 4/19/00 | N/A | Expanded 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-55
|
Involve state organizations industry organizations, and land grant university cooperative extension programs in crafting and executing the public information and education messages through the development of a coalition task force. Utilize public relations firms that have experience with the development of industry messages such as food safety campaigns, to work with the coalition task force. |
PI/E |
XOA-48-54, 56, E 69-70, P 14) | 4/19/00 | 3/30/00 | 4/12/00 Expanded & Revised 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
OA-56
|
Develop a character similar to Smokey Bear, perhaps utilizing a beagle or somether cartoon-type figure as a national symbol for invasive plant pest exclusion. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48-55, E 69, 70, P 14) | 4/19/00 | 3/30/00 | Expanded 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
OA-57
|
Pursue the allocation of fines collected from violations of the quarantine rules and passenger violations that are currently channeled to the general fund to provide funding for a national informational campaign. There is current case law that supports this concept as a tool for public educations. |
CP |
X(OA 37, E 5E 118, E 119P 5) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/14/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
|
OA-58
|
Utilize IS field personnel in strengthening the data gathering systems in foreign countries. Engage their help in identifying resources that can assist in the data gathering programs. |
II |
X(I 46, 47, 48) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 4/14/05 | 4/28 | |
|
OA-59
|
Engage IS personnel in risk assessment development of commodities exported to the U.S. Utilize their input in evaluating the risk potential of new commodities with the focus on preventing invasive pests from entering the U.S. Improve dialogue with IS personnel in risk assessment activities early in the process to highlight potential high-risk elements that may not be identified in the scientific literature. |
RA |
(OA-11) | N/A | 5/30/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21/05 | 7/5 | |
|
OA-60
|
Work with IS management to provide training of in-country IS personnel on the needs of protecting U.S. plant resources and raise their understanding of the safeguarding system. |
ED |
X(OA-18, 21, E-72,120, I-29, 36, P-17) | 2/15/01 Revised & expanded | 2/15/01 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 | ||
| OA-61 | Open communications with IS field personnel and IS management regarding the potential sites for preclearance of passengers. Make sure IS is involved in the debate over the value of passenger preclearance and consider the input from the field personnel in the decisionmaking process. |
RM |
X (E-27-28) | 5/9/01 | 5/9/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/17/01 | 9/25/01 | 10/9 |
| OA-62 | Assure involvement with IS field personnel in evaluating and eradicating pest populations in countries that pose a high risk to the U.S. such as fruit fly populations in Mexico and Central America. |
RM |
X | 4/18/02 | 4/18/02 | 5/1/02 | 6/24/05 | 7/8/05 | 7/22 |
|
E-1
|
Work with Congress and stakeholders to have the Plant Protection Act passed during the current congressional session. |
A |
X(OA-1, D-11) | 3/17/00 | N/A | 4/6/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
E-2
|
Review each of its quarantines for conformation with the Plant Protection Act and adherence to international standards for quarantine regulations. |
A |
X D-12, E-4, 49, 55, 56, 74 | 7/27/00 | 6/30/00 | 8/23/00 | 2/27/01 | 6/15/02 | 6/30/02 |
|
E-3
|
Develop a strategy of quarantine development tied to pest risk potential that is reasonable, enforceable, and transparent. |
RM |
X | 3/28/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/17/01 | 9/25/01 | 10/9 | |
|
E-4
|
Begin its quarantine revision process with the revision of its Fruits and Vegetables (Q56) and Nursery Stock (Q37) quarantines. Target completion within 5 years. |
A |
XD-12, E-2, 49, 55, 56, 74 | 4/13/00 | N/A | 6/26/00 Revised 8/23/00 | 2/27/01 | 6/15/02 | 6/30/02 |
|
E-5
|
Develop civil penalty procedures that incorporate a tiered penalty structure based on cargo value but within the allowances found in the Plant Protection Act. |
CP |
X(OA 37, OA 57, E 118E 119, P 5) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/14/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
|
E-6
|
Review current law regarding employee liability and, if warranted, amend or develop legislation to provide adequate employee liability protection. |
A |
X | 2/12/01 | 2/14/01 | 2/12/01 Revised 3/15/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/07/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-7
|
Revise current user fee regulations to adequately fund APHIS inspection and enforcement responsibilities and fully incorporate overtime needs, and to compensate for the current appropriation shortfall and any shortfalls resulting from implementation of a tiered assessment program. |
UF |
X (E-52, OA-35) | 6/8/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28/01 | ||
|
E-8
|
Develop a tiered fee assessment schedule to provide for a reduced fee structure as a monetary incentive to encourage participation in predeparture clearance initiatives, implement public awareness programs, supply amnesty bins, etc. |
UF |
X | 6/8/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28 | ||
|
E-9
|
Implement user fees for agricultural inspection at ports of entry between the U.S. and Canada. |
UF |
N/A | N/A | 4/1/05 | 4/1/05 | 5/3/05 | 5/17 | |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
E-10
|
Implement a user fee for cargo to enable adequate inspection levels, particularly at land border crossings. |
UF |
XD-16, 22 | 9/26/00 | 8/00 | 10/3/00 | 6/7/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/8/01 |
|
E-11
|
Determine its role and fully participate in the development of the Invasive Species Council and appoint any and all necessary staff to assure full participation. |
L |
X | 6/23/01 | 6/25/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28 | |
|
E-12
|
Identify areas where it will lead and partner with other agencies in implementation of the Executive Order on Invasive Species. |
L |
X(OA-5) | 9/1/02 | N/A | 10/02 | 11/02 | 11/2/03 | 11/16/04 |
|
E-13
|
Take any appropriate action to ensure that APHIS stakeholders are represented on the advisory committee on invasive species. |
L |
X | 2/7/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 4/23/01 | 5/7/01 |
|
E-14
|
Assure that the introduction pathways for arachnids and snakes, and any other invasive plant pests not under the direct jurisdiction of APHIS are adequately addressed and mitigated. |
SC |
X | 10/5/00 | N/A | 10/6/00 | 7/9/02 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-15
|
Revise and advertise its contracting guidelines for private party risk assessment preparation. |
RA |
X | 3/10/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/10/00 | 7/6/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
| E-16 | Seek full cost recovery from exporting countries or exporters for the development of risk assessments needed to evaluate import permit requests or allow exporters or exporting countries to conduct pest risk assessments under APHIS guidance. |
UF |
N/A | N/A | 4/1/05 | 4/1/05 | 5/3 | 5/17 | |
| E-17 | Continuously improve its pest risk assessment models. |
RA |
(OA-6,8) | N/A | N/A | 7/15/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/3/05 | 8/17 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| E-18 | Make existing interception data used to develop risk assessments electronically available to all Federal and state regulatory staff. |
IM |
X(I 6, 7) | 4/13/00 | 3/31/00 | 4/14/00 Revised 6/26/00 | 2/7/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
| E-19 | Share international pest risk assessment data by developing compatible systems and procedures (under IPPC and FAO) |
IM |
X (E-33) | 7/20/01 | 7/20/01 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 9/04 | 9/18 |
| E-20 | Exploit use of web technology to facilitate information exchange. |
IT |
X(I-8, 24, 26) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 | 7/5/05 | 7/13/05 | 7/27 | |
| E-21 | Identify, with International Services, pest data information needs based on import permit inquiries and predicted trade flows to facilitate risk assessment needs. |
II |
X | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 7/26/05 | 8/9 | |
| E-22 | Change its policy to accept phytosanitary certification from countries with valid export certification programs. |
RM |
X | 4/17/02 | 4/17/02 | 5/1/02 | 8/1/03 | 10/20/03 | 11/4/03 |
|
E-23
|
Expand the use of pest suppression efforts, sterile fly corridors and preventive release programs in areas particularly vulnerable to invasion such as those along the U.S./Canada and Mexico borders as well as southern California and Florida. |
RM |
X (E-25, 38) | 4/17/02 | 4/17/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-24
|
Work with Mexico and the U.S. border states to develop a strategy to eradicate or develop a pest-free area for Mexican fruit fly along the U.S./Mexico border. |
RM |
X (E-40) | 6/28/01 | 6/28/01 | 5/1/02 | 7/23/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-25
|
Identify other pests in Canada, the Caribbean and Mexico that may migrate into the U.S. naturally and develop suppression strategies to prevent or postpone entry. |
RA |
(E-23, 38) | 4/17/02 | 4/17/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
E-26
|
Expand production capacity of sterile insects to support existing and potential sterile release programs. |
ST |
X | 12/3/01 | N/A | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/23/02 | 9/6 |
| E-27 | Work with the government of Guatemala and affected air carriers to implement a predeparture passenger clearance program and evaluate it within 2 years. |
RM |
X (OA-61, E-28) | 5/9/01 | 5/9/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/17/01 | 9/25/01 | 10/9 |
| E-28 | Determine the highest risk locations offshore and implement the most effective procedures found in the Guatemala program. |
RM |
X (OA-61, E-27) | 5/9/01 | 5/9/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/17/01 | 9/25/01 | 10/9 |
|
E-29
|
Pursue legislation to enable participation with CFIA in predeparture clearance of U.S. destined passengers at Canadian ports of departure. |
A |
X | 2/12/01 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 | ||
| E-30 | Vigorously pursue regionalization through U.S. and Canadian adoption of equivalent "perimeter" safeguards with the long-term goal of deemphasizing traditional border inspection activities OR |
L |
X | 2/7/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 4/23/01 | 5/7/01 |
|
E-31
|
Dramatically strengthen and expand pest exclusion activities at the Canadian border by placing adequate staff at Canadian border crossings, adapting work shifts to reflect trading patterns across the border, and aggressively expanding smuggling interdiction efforts. |
L |
X | 2/7/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 9/24/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-32
|
Begin implementation, including intraregional implementation of the North American Plant Protection Organization standard for solid wood packing materials. Pursue global harmonization for solid wood packing material pest mitigation. |
RM |
X | 9/24/02 | 9/24/02 | 3/15/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
| E-33 | Explore opportunities to share databases using solid wood packing material interception and rejection data as a focus. |
IM |
X (E-19) | 6/14/01 | 6/14/01 | 6/22/01 | 7/25/01 revised 5/1/02 7/9/02 | 9/4/02 | 9/18 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| E-34 | Cooperate to develop a strategy to reduce the risk of pest introduction associated with in-transit shipments within North America. |
RM |
X | 4/30/02 | N/A | 5/1/02 | 9/24/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-35
|
Begin developing plans for the harmonization of phytosanitary requirements that apply to other countries (the "perimeter" approach) with the existing preclearance activities such as the program for flower bulbs from Holland. |
RM |
X (E-36) | 1/15/03 | 1/15/03 | 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
| E-36 | Develop a longer-term initiative to apply the perimeter approach to pests such as exotic fruit flies. |
RM |
X (E-35) | 1/15/03 | 1/15/03 | 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-37
|
Support CanadaÆs proposed analysis of existing statutory authorities that could target and discourage movement of prohibited fruit fly host materials into the U.S. |
L |
X | 6/22/01 | N/A | 6/22/01 | 9/22/03 | 10/07/03 | 10/21 |
| E-38 | Explore opportunities for collaboration with Canada to study and respond to potential pest introduction pathways into the Pacific Northwest, and pursue biological control strategies for pests that have become established in both countries. |
RM |
X (E-23, 25) | 4/17/02 | 4/17/02 | 5/1/02 revised 3/15/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-39
|
Assist, with funding and technical support, the exotic fruit fly eradication initiative in Central America. |
L |
X | 9/1/02 | N/A | 10/02 | 11/02 | 11/02 | 11/16/04 |
|
E-40
|
Eradicate or establish a pest-free area for Mexican fruit fly on both sides of the U.S./Mexico border |
RM |
X (E-24) | 6/28/01 | 6/28/01 | 5/1/02 | 7/23/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
| E-41 | Develop and implement a plan to slow the spread of brown citrus aphid from Belize into Mexico and ultimately the U.S. |
RM |
X | 12/14/01 | 1/6/02 | 1/25/02 | 2/8/02 | ||
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
E-42
|
Continue the effort to eradicate olive fruit fly in California as a demonstration of support for Mexico, which has a substantial olive production area near the U.S. border. |
DR |
X | N/A | 10/3/00 | 11/6/00 | 11/29 | 12/14 | |
|
E-43
|
Develop a longer-term initiative that includes plans for export of exclusion and detection capabilities and specific pest and disease suppression activities to apply the perimeter approach. |
II |
X | 4/17/02 | 4/17/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 revised 3/15/03 | 4/11/05 | 4/25 |
|
E-44
|
Begin to work towards a goal of establishment of a global list of pests and diseases with supporting pest risk analysis to drive exclusion regulations. Apply these risk analyses to revision of 7 CFR 319.37, 7 CFR 330.200. |
II |
X(I-19, 21, 23, 44, E-48) | 4/00 | 10/6/00 | 6/26/00 Resubmitted 10/1/00 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
E-45
|
Require and initiate risk assessments for seed importation. |
RA |
12/1/01 | 1/25/02 | 5/1/02 | 9/24/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/28 | |
|
E-46
|
Consider adopting a modified "clean list" approach for propagative material, specifying what is permissible subsequent to risk assessment, rather than the current "dirty list" that prohibits or restricts specific articles only. To begin this process, work with subject experts to develop a prototype assessment process upon which subsequent regulation could be based. |
RA |
N/A | 6/9/05 | 6/20/05 | 7/6/05 | 7/20 | ||
|
E-47
|
Require sampling and testing as a part of all plant importation activities. This would require research and technology development to allow rapid generalized testing, for plant viruses and phytoplasmas, for example; testing could be at point of origin or port of entry. |
ST |
X (E-91, P-13) | 1/28/03 | N/A | 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-48
|
Purge lists of "phantom diseases," like the rose wilt virus that are not recognized by the scientific community. |
ST |
X(I-19, 21, 23, 44, E-44) | 2/26/01 | 2/26/01 | 2/26/01 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
| E-49 | Coordinate noxious weed and invasive species initiatives with review of 7 CFR 319.37 and 330.200. |
A |
X(E-4) | 4/13/00 | N/A | 4/13/00 Revised 8/23/00 | 2/27/01 | 6/15/02 | 6/30/02 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| E-50 | Work with the National Plant Board and NAPPO to lead by example in the development of regulations and implementation of the "regulated nonquarantine pests" concept for certain types of propagative material. Grapevine, deciduous fruit trees, and chrysanthemum propagative material offer potential models. |
L |
X | 9/1/02 | N/A | 10/02 | 9/24/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-51
|
Develop a strategic plan for its smuggling interdiction efforts to identify staffing and funding needs. |
S |
X | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 9/16/00 | 10/17 | 10/31 |
|
E-52
|
Secure an increase in AQI user fees for expanded smuggling interdiction activities based on the strategic plan. |
UF |
X (E-7, OA-35) | 6/8/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28 | ||
| E-53 | Investigate and identify the motives for smuggling to enable development of more effective mitigation strategies. |
RM |
X | 4/24/01 | 4/24/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/25/01 | 9/18/01 | 10/2 |
| E-54 | Use the information gathered to identify commercial product development opportunities. |
PI/E |
X | N/A | 10/02 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 | |
| E-55 | Prohibit the transit and entry of plants and plant products not in compliance with U.S. entry requirements until and unless the following recommendations have adequately mitigated the invasive plant pest risk associated with this pathway. |
A |
XD-12, E-2, 4, 49, 56, 74 | 7/27/00 | 6/30/00 | 8/23/00 | 2/27/01 | 6/15/02 | 6/30 |
| E-56 | Revise the safeguarding regulation (7 CFR 352) to incorporate pest risk into the decisionmaking process for permit issuance. |
A |
XD-12, E-2, 4, 49, 55, 74 | 7/27/00 | 6/30/00 | 8/23/00 | 2/27/01 | 6/15/02 | 6/30 |
| E-57 | Review and update its transit guidelines, provide headquarters staff support and develop a permit review process for port staff. |
RAP |
X(E-58) | 6/20/00 | 6/20/00 | 6/23/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| E-58 | Develop a risk assessment process to evaluate transit permit requests. |
RAP |
X(E-57) | 6/20/00 | 6/20/00 | 6/23/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
E-59
|
Work with other FIS and port authorities to assure that adequate staffing and equipment are identified and in place prior to establishment of new ports of entry. |
L |
X | 4/14/00 | N/A | 4/14/00 | 4/21/00 transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 6/12/00 | 6/26 |
|
E-60
|
Implement the use of "smart" x-ray equipment as it becomes commercially available. |
ST |
X(E-63, 98) | 4/13/00 | 4/13/00 | 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 Resubmitted 2/27/01 | 5/8/01 | 5/22 |
|
E-61
|
Place video imaging equipment at plant inspection stations to expedite species identification. |
ST |
X | 6/27/00 | 5/1/00 | 6/23/00 | 2/27/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28/ |
| E-62 | Use existing agricultural quarantine inspection monitoring data to target port of entry inspection priorities, assess port of entry activities, and estimate the risk presented by new or unstaffed ports of entry. |
RA |
X | 10/4/00 | 1/22/00 | 2/7/01 Revised 6/22/01 | |||
|
E-63
|
Require all passenger baggage to be subject to examination using "smart" x-ray technology that detects quarantine material. |
RM |
X(E-60, 98) | 4/13/00 | 4/13/00 | 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 Resubmitted 2/27/01 | 5/8/01 | 5/22 |
|
E-64
|
Work with Customs to place APHIS staff at preprimary roving location areas at all high traffic ports of entry. |
S |
X | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 7/17/00 transferred to CBP, 8/7/03 | 11/20 | 12/4 |
|
E-65
|
Develop legislation to prohibit all unprocessed food and plant products or require phytosanitary certification in passenger baggage. |
A |
X | 2/13/01 | N/A | 2/13/01 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
E-66
|
Explore the possibility of privatizing air passenger clearance. |
A |
X | N/A | 5/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 | |
|
E-67
|
Request that U.S. Customs amend its declaration (Customs Form 6059) to clarify plant quarantine requirements. |
L |
X | 2/7/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 4/23/01 | 5/7/01 |
| E-68 | Negotiate with the U.S. Department of State to include a public education flyer in its visa applications within the coming year. |
L |
X | 6/22/01 | N/A | 6/22/01 | 11/02 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-69
|
Negotiate with air carriers to include a public education flyer with passenger ticketing information in the langauge of the country of origin and to include a question regarding possession of agricultural products when ticket agents perform safety prescreening within 2 years. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48-56, E-70, P-14) | 4/19/00 | 3/30/00 | 6/26/00 Expanded | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
E-70
|
Negotiate and contract with air carriers to provide amnesty bins at points of departure within 2 years. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48-56, E-69, P-14) | 4/19/00 | 3/30/00 | 6/26/00 Expanded | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
E-71
|
Develop and foster close and effective working relationships with other Federal Inspection Service agencies. |
L |
X | 9/1/02 | N/A | 10/02 | 11/02 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-72
|
Support and encourage training for use of and access to Customs databases. |
ED |
X(OA-18, 21, 60, E-120, I-29, 36, P-17) | 2/15/01 Revised & expanded | 2/15/01 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 | ||
|
E-73
|
Implement the NAPPO standard for solid wood packing materials with the long-term goal of a worldwide prohibition of solid wood packing materials in cargo transport. |
A |
X | 6/11/01 | N/A | 6/22/01 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| E-74 | Require that all empty containers be free of all plant and animal residue prior to entry. |
A |
XD-12, E-2,4, 29, 55, 56 | 7/27/00 | 6/30/00 | 8/23/00 | 2/27/01 | 6/15/02 | 6/30 |
|
E-75
|
Expand the border cargo release program to all ports of entry. |
RM |
X | 9/29/00 | 9/29/00 | 9/29/00 | 10/01/00 | 12/14 | 12/28 |
|
E-76
|
Develop a destination inspection program for low-risk cargo. |
RM |
X(E-77) | 6/9/00 | 6/9/00 | 6/16/00 | 7/17/00 Transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 2/5/01 | 2/19 |
|
E-77
|
Develop a destination inspection program for immediate transport cargo at approved devanning facilities for high-risk cargo during seasonal peak traffic periods. |
RM |
X(E-76) | 6/9/00 | 6/9/00 | 6/16/00 | 7/17/00 | 2/5/01 | 2/19 |
| E-78 | Conduct a pathway risk assessment for rail shipments and monitor this pathway based on the risks that are identified. |
RA |
X | 6/16/00 | 6/16/00 | 6/21/00 Revised 2/7/01 | 8/2/05 | ||
| E-79 | Install smart x-ray equipment on international mail and private parcel belts in order to examine all foreign origin mail and parcels. |
ST |
X | N/A | 10/02 | 11/02 | Transferred to CBP, 8/7/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-80
|
Use dogs to screen mail at all international mail and parcel ports of entry until x-ray equipment is installed. |
RM |
X(E 92) | 3/28/00 | 3/31/00 | 4/3/00 | 7/6/00 Transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 11/20 | 12/4 |
|
E-81
|
Conduct a specific pest pathway risk analysis to determine the invasive plant pest entry and establishment risk posed by private airplanes and cruise ships and revise its monitoring levels accordingly. |
RA |
X | 3/26/00 | 3/26/00 | 4/10/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
E-82
|
Use renewable compliance agreements to assure proper handling or disposition for repeat entries as a monitoring and pest mitigation strategy. |
RM |
X | 10/2/00 | 10/2/00 | 9/26/00 | 11/9/00 | 11/21 | 12/5 |
| E-83 | Conduct a pest pathway risk assessment for air and maritime garbage to identify and evaluate the actual pest risk. |
RA |
X(E-84) | 6/9/00 | 6/9/00 | 6/16/00 | 11/9/00 | 2/6/01 | 2/20 |
|
E-84
|
If warranted, place disposal of maritime garbage under a compliance agreement. |
RM |
X(E-83) | 6/9/00 | 6/9/00 | 6/16/00 | 11/9/00 | 2/6/01 | 2/20 |
| E-85 | Request that the Invasive Species Council established under Executive Order 13112 coordinate further actions to mitigate ballast water risk with APHIS and the Coast Guard |
L |
X(E-86) | 2/7/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 4/23/01 | 5/7/01 |
| E-86 | Request that the Invasive Species Council review the Coast GuardÆs regulation (33 CFR 150.1510) and suggest revisions , if necessary, to include other ports of entry based on the identified risk. |
L |
X(E-85) | 2/7/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 4/23/01 | 5/7/01 |
|
E-87
|
Evaluate Methods staff performance according to their accomplishments in providing solutions to identified AQI needs at least every 3 years. |
ST |
X | 5/25/00 | 5/25/00 | 10/6/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/13/01 | 8/27/01 |
|
E-88
|
Develop an annual list of "needs" by AQI staff for submission to Methods for its consideration. |
ST |
X | 3/23/00 | 3/27/00 | 4/14/00 Revised 6/23/00 | 7/17/00 | 11/20 | 12/4 |
| E-89 | Provide a listing of studies and development programs to AQI staff on an annual basis to inform them of supportive work that may be coming on line. |
ST |
X(E-90) | 8/30/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/22/00 | 2/27/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/8/01 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| E-90 | Have AQI representatives participate in the development of Methods annual work plans to assure AQI needs are incorporated and met. |
ST |
X E-89 | 8/30/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/22/00 | 2/27/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/8/01 |
| E-91 | Develop rapid generalized testing for target species. |
ST |
X (E-47, P-13) | 1/28/03 | N/A | 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
E-92
|
Place detector dog teams at all high-risk ports of entry to facilitate passenger and baggage clearance. |
RM |
X(E-80) | 3/28/00 | 3/31/00 | 4/3/00 | 7/6/00 | 11/20 | 12/4 Transferred to CBP |
|
E-93
|
Review its training and breed selection program to maximize use of different screening techniques and breed capabilities. |
ST |
X | 6/22/01 | N/A | 6/22/01 | 7/25/01 Revised 5/1/02 & 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
| E-94 | Negotiate with Customs to cross-train its dogs to screen for agricultural products at smaller ports of entry. |
L |
X | 11/5/00 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 4/23/01 | 5/7/01 |
|
E-95
|
Develop or abandon development of tomographic x-ray technology. |
ST |
X | N/A | 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/07/03 | 10/21 | |
|
E-96
|
Acquire and begin using Vivid TechnologyÆs dual energy x-ray system and any other identified smart x-ray equipment to expedite screening and clearance of cargo, baggage, and mail. |
L |
X(E-97. 101) | 9/25/00 | N/A | 10/10/00 | 11/6/00 | 11/29 | Transferred to DHS |
|
E-97
|
Negotiate with Customs to use its truck x-ray capability to screen cargo containers. |
L |
X(E-96, 101) | 9/25/00 | N/A | 10/10/00 | 11/6/00 | 11/29 | Transferred to DHS |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
E-98
|
Test the utility of Vivid x-ray equipment at high-risk ports of origin, i.e., Guatemala City Guatemala. |
ST |
X(E-60-63) | 4/13/00 | N/A | 4/14/00 Expanded & Revised 6/26/00 | 7/17/00 Resubmitted 2/27/01 | 5/8/01 | 5/22 |
|
E-99
|
Develop and use genetic mapping to identify interception origins and support pathway risk models. |
ST |
X (9/26/02) | N/A | 3/1/03 | 7/21/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/21 | 11/4/03 |
| E-100 | Monitor how Customs uses remote surveillance and adopt this strategy at other locations if it is determined to be a useful and effective clearance strategy. |
ST |
12/23/02 | Transferred to CBP | 8/7/03 | ||||
|
E-101
|
Monitor and provide funding for the development of new x-ray technologies. |
L |
X (E-96,97) | 9/25/00 | N/A | 10/10/00 | 11/6/00 | 11/29 | Transferred to DHS |
| E-102 | Seek full cost recovery via a fee for service, or privatize service functions not mandated by law under close APHIS oversight. These services include certain trade facilitation activities, development of export programs, export certification, post-entry quarantine, etc. |
UF |
X | 9/26/00 | 5/00 | 10/3/00 Revised 5/1/02 | 4/5/05 | 5/4/05 | 5/18 |
|
E-103
|
Require and budget for staff replacement at ports of entry when staff are on temporary duty assignments for preclearance. |
S |
X (OA-10, E-110) | 4/10/00 | 4/3/00 | 6/30/00 Resubmitted 10/3/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 Transferred to CBP. |
| E-104 | Provide ongoing staff training in quarantine laws and regulations, computer and equipment use, and data and risk management, and education on the impacts of invasive pests. |
ED |
X (In four parts: 104a-d) | 6/26/00 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 | |||
|
E-105
|
Increase communication channels horizontally and vertically between headquarters and port staff by prioritizing and scheduling staff meetings, etc. |
L |
X | 9/25/00 | N/A | 10/10/00 | 11/9/00 | 11/29 | 12/14 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
E-106
|
Allocate individual port budgets to the port directors for local level resource management. |
L |
X | 2/7/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 Transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 3/7/01 | 3/21 |
|
E-107
|
Require port staff to collect and use agricultural quarantine inspection monitoring data as it was intended and annually use it to revise the workload accomplishment data guidelines and codes accordingly. |
IM |
X | 4/13/00 | N/A | 4/14/00 | 7/17/00 Resubmitted 2/27/01 Transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 6/5/01 | 6/19 |
|
E-108
|
Redefine quarantine material interceptions to include country of origin pest risks and commodity volume. |
IM |
X | 4/13/00 | 3/16/00 | 4/14/00 Revised 6/30/00 | 7/17/00 Transferred to CBP, 8/7/03 | 6/13/01 | 6/27 |
|
E-109
|
Initiate and implement work shifts to coincide with workload and where workload criteria justify a second shift (i.e., an average of two call-back inspections per day) [sic] and hold management accountable for implementation. |
S |
X (E-112) | 4/10/00 | 4/10/00 | 4/10/00 Revised 6/30/00 | 9/16/00 Transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 6/13/01 | 6/27 |
|
E-110
|
Assign staff at ports of entry where evidence shows the need for permanent staff. |
S |
X(OA 10) | 4/10/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/10/00 Revised 6/30/00 | 9/16/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
|
E-111
|
Expand the use of technical positions for activities such as passenger baggage clearance and upgrade APHISûPPQ officers where work assignments warrant such upgrades. |
S |
X | 4/10/00 | 4/10/00 | 4/10/00 Revised 6/30/00 | 9/16/00 Transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 11/21 | 12/5 |
|
E-112
|
Revise its overtime regulation and policy to provide for the establishment of scheduled weekend tours of duty. |
S |
X (E-109) | 4/10/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/10/00 | 9/16/00 Transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 6/13/01 | 6/27 |
|
E-113
|
Explore the feasibility of an overtime cap. |
A |
X | 3/1/03 | 3/03 | 6/22/01 Revised 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/07/03 | 10/21 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| E-114 | Request an AQI program work plan from its information technology support staff. |
IT |
X (E-115, I-17) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 To be revised | 3/16/04 | 3/30 |
| E-115 | Integrate its information technology resources and staff under the AQI program management. |
IT |
X (E-114, I-17) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 - To be revised | 3/16/04 | 3/30 |
| E-116 | Physically co-locate information technology staff with AQI staff at port of entry locations. |
IT |
X (I-1, 2, 5, & 18) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 - To be revised | 3/16/04 | 3/30 |
|
E-117
|
Explore the feasibility of outsourcing data entry to reduce workload. |
IM |
X | 7/00 | N/A | 10/6/00 | 11/6/00 | 11/29 | 12/14 |
|
E-118
|
Revise its civil penalty guidelines to clarify enforcement provisions in consultation with APHIS port staff. |
CP |
X(OA 37, OA 57, E 5,E 119, P 5) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/14/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
|
E-119
|
Develop a civil penalty structure to provide consistency in penalty assessment. |
CP |
X(OA 37,OA 57E 5E 118P 5) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/14/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
| E-120 | Revise its training program and provide staff ongoing refresher training for civil penalty assessment. |
ED |
X(OA-18, 21, 60, E-72, I-29, 36, P-17) | 2/15/01 Revised & expanded | 2/15/01 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 | ||
|
E-121
|
Require ports to track and account for civil penalty actions taken. |
CP |
X | 6/6/00 | 7/17/00 Transferred to CBP 8/7/03 | 1/14/01 | 1/18 | ||
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
D-1
|
Restructure the existing Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey program to create a Federal and State Cooperative Invasive Plant Pest Survey Program (CIPPS) under the supervision of the National Invasive Plant Pest Coordinator to set invasive plant pest detection and response priorities and implement survey and detection activities in the United States. Designate the position of the Coordinator to report directly to the APHIS-PPQ Deputy Administrator. The Coordinator will be a permanent member of the Standing Committee on the Collection and Use of Intelligence on Exotic pests (I-40) |
DR |
X(D 2, 2a-c, 14, 24) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/31/00 | 9/15 |
|
D-2
|
Institute a three-tiered committee system to assist the National coordinator in identifying and prioritizing plant pest and disease detection and response activities in the United States. |
DR |
X(D 1, 2a, 2b, 2c, 14, 24) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/31/00 | 9/15 |
|
D-2a
|
State committees composed of key stakeholders in pest detection activities, should be identified by the lead State and Federal plant protection officials in each state. |
DR |
X(D 1, 2, 2b, 2c, 14, 24 | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/31/00 | 9/15 |
|
D-2b
|
Regional committees should include the State and Federal plant protection officials and Regional Plant Board members from each state in the region. |
DR |
X(D 1, 2, 2a, 2c, 14, 24) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/31/00 | 9/15 |
|
D-2c
|
The National Committee should include representatives from each of the Regional Committees. The National Committee should be chaired by the National Coordinator. |
DR |
X(D 1, 2, 2a, 2b, 14, 24) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/31/00 | 9/15 |
|
D-3
|
Develop and endorse a conceptual design for the Cooperative Invasive Plant Pest Survey Program (CIPPS) that will: |
DR |
X(D 3a, 3b, 3c, 26) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/00 | 9/21/00 | 11/5 |
|
D-3a
|
Establish a nationawide surveillance program to identify potential pest organisms and high risk sentinel areas for introductions, |
DR |
X(D 3, 3b, 3c, 26) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/00 | 9/21/00 | 11/5 |
|
D-3b
|
Standardize invasive plant pest detection activities at the State, regional, and national levels, and |
DR |
X(D 3, 3a, 3c, 26) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/000 | 9/21/00 | 11/5 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
D-3c
|
Support export certification requirements and domestic program duties. |
DR |
X(D 3, 3a, 3b, 26) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/6/00 | 9/21/00 | 11/5 |
|
D-4
|
Review and revise the APHIS-PPQ Emergency Programs Manual on an annual basis to ensure that it meets pest response needs. |
DR |
X | 5/24/01 | 5/24/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/17/01 | 9/11/01 | 9/15 |
|
D-5
|
Revise available emergency response guidelines to reflect current response technology and biological data. |
DR |
X(D-6) | 1/26/01 | 3/29/00 | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 8/13/01 | 8/27 |
|
D-6
|
Prepare emergency response guidelines for plant pests that pose an imminent threat to American plant resources. The comprehensive exotic pest list currently under development by the Entomological Society of America, the American Phytopathological Society, and the Weed Science Society of America under contract by APHIS-PPQ will assist in the determination of species with the highest potential risk. These are the species for which emergency guidelines are most urgently needed. |
DR |
X(D-5) | 1/26/01 | 3/29/00 | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 8/13/01 | 8/27 |
|
D-7
|
Establish a nationally coordinated pest response plan that is administered under supervision of the National Invasive Plant Pest Coordinator (D-1). Use the three-tiered committee system (D-2) to review response guidelines and set response priorities, and in cooperation with the Director of the Methods Development unit, recommend response development priorities. |
DR |
X(D-10) | 6/12/00 | 6/12/00 | 6/20/00 | 7/17/00 | 8/13/01 | 8/27 |
| D-8 | Coordinate and augment when appropriate the development and implementation of response tools to mitigate impacts from established invasive plant pests, i.e., biological control methodology. |
ST |
X | 3/12/03 | 3/15/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 | |
| D-9 | Secure funding to expand and establish the infrastructure required to develop and implement effective plant pest management programs when eradication is not deemed feasible. |
DR |
X | 5/17/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/25/01 | 9/25/01 | 10/9 | |
| D-10 | Identify United States Department of Agriculture organizational and procedural deficiencies that hinder rapid response to invasive plant pest detection. Develop and implement procedural enhancements to expedite the most efficient and effective emergency response mechanisms. Empower personnel for immediate response in all program areas, including procurement of essential resources. |
DR |
X(D-7) | 6/12/00 | 6/12/00 | 6/20/00 | 7/17/00 | 8/13/01 | 8/27 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
D-11
|
Work with Congress and stakeholders to have the Plant Protection Act passed during the current congressional session. |
A |
X(OA-1, E-1) | 3/17/00 | N/A | 4/6/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
| D-12 | Review all regulations pertaining to invasive plant pest response activities to determine relevance and ability to adapt to new technology or management systems. |
A |
XE-2, 4, 49, 55, 56, 74 | 7/27/00 | 6/30/00 | 8/23/00 | 2/27/01 | 6/15/02 | 6/30 |
|
D-13
|
Meet pest management needs, in part through compliance agreements that provide an opportunity for involvement of growers, dealers, and other stakeholders. Allow stakeholders to provide needed services subject to inspection and monitoring for compliance by official agencies. |
SC |
X | 6/16/00 | N/A | 6/20/00 | 12/14/01 | 1/25/02 | 2/8/02 |
|
D-14
|
Appoint and empower the National Invasive Plant Pest Coordinator (NIPPC) (D-1) to manage, with guidance from the three-tiered committee system (D-2), allocation of invasive plant pest detection funds. This is inclusive of funding for research and development needs (I-38) |
DR |
XD-1, 2, 2a-c, 24 | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 3/29/00 | 4/21/00 | 8/31/00 | 9/15 |
| D-15 | Establish, through the National Plant Board, criteria for a State and Federal cost-sharing formula for exotic pest detection activities. Include incentives for State and industry participation. |
SC |
X | 6/16/00 | N/A | 6/20/00 | 7/15/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
|
D-16
|
Revise and expand the user fee authority and structure to impose a fee for imported cargo and containers as these increase the risk of introducing invasive plant pest. Allocate a portion of cargo user fees for exotic pest detection activities throughout the nation with emphasis on high risk areas where cargo containers are devanned. |
UF |
XD-22, E-10 | 9/26/00 | 8/00 | 6/20/00 Revised 10/3/00 | 6/7/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/8/01 |
|
D-17
|
Aggressively seek a just proportional share of the funding made available by Congress to address the invasive alien species issue in order to establish and maintain viable pest detection and early response activities. |
L |
2/6/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/6/01 | 2/27/01 | 3/7/01 | 3/21 |
| D-18 | Estimate the baseline funding level necessary to permit the Agency to cover start-up costs to ensure a rapid response to invasive plant pest incursions. |
DR |
X | 5/24/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/17/01 | 9/11/01 | 9/25 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| D-19 | Amend existing Federal and State cooperative agreements to include a standardized cost-sharing agreemment with State cooperators for pest response activities. |
SC |
X | 6/16/00 | N/A | 6/20/00 | 7/15/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
| D-20 | Identify and justify the role of stakeholders in invasive plant pest response activities during both initial emergency programs and long-term control strategies, i.e., in-kind contribution of personnel for trapping and participation on technical advisory panels. |
SC |
X | 2/9/01 | 12/00 | 4/25/05 | 5/1/05 | 7/8/05 | 7/22 |
| D-21 | Continue to explore appropriate methods, including the use of AQI user fees to develop a $50 million no-year contingency account for emergency invasive plant pest response activities. This fund should be administered in a manner similar to the Interstate Pest Control Compact. |
UF |
X(OA-39) | 1/31/01 | 1/31/01 | 2/12/01 | 4/10/05 | 5/4/05 | 5/18 |
|
D-22
|
Expand the scope of AQI user fees to include cargo containers and provide a mechanism for use of these fees for invasive plant pest response activities beyond the ports. |
UF |
XD-16, E-10 | 9/26/00 | 8/00 | 10/3/00 | 6/7/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/8/01 |
|
D-23
|
Provide a level of funding for the Methods Development unit that allows this unit to provide the best available detection tools. The methods development unit must maintain a staffing structure that not only allows the unit to respond to the current needs for pest detection, but also to expand its work to meet demands for new technology. Unit staff should be encouraged to consult experts outside APHIS-PPQ when appropriate. |
ST |
X (D-27, 33) | 6/19/01 | 6/22/01 | 7/25/01 | 10/02/02 | 10/17 | |
|
D-24
|
Assign to the Regional Committees the task of identifying survey needs, coordinating involvement by states, and allocating funds subject to approval of the National Invasive Plant Pest Coordinator. Regional committees will make broad recommendations on survey methods after conferring with the methods development unit. |
DR |
XD-1, 2, 2a-c, 14 | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 3/29/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/31/00 | 9/15 |
|
D-25
|
Identify potential invasive plant pests and corresponding sentinel areas at high risk for their entry. Utilize comprehensive invasive plant pest lists currently being compiled by several professional societies (i.e., the Entomological Society of America and the American Phytopathological Society) and international databases to facilitate this porocess. |
RA |
|||||||
|
D-26
|
Establish and periodically revise exotic pest detection guidelines, including trapping methodology, for potential invasive exotic pests. Detection guidelines are necessary for all species identified as potential invasive plant pests that pose an imminent threat of entry into the United States. |
DR |
X(D 3, 3a, 3b, 3c) | 3/17/00 | 3/29/00 | 3/29/00 | 7/6/00 | 9/21/01 | 11/15 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
D-27
|
Increase funding to the APHIS-PPQ methods development unit and its collaborating technical researchers for development of novel methods for invasive plant pest response activities. A 40-50 percent increase over the FY 1999 allocation is necessary for methods to maintain a minimal level of activity for development of detection and response methodologies. Further funding increases are necessary to expand methods activities to adequately meet the technical needs of APHIS-PPQ and the States. |
ST |
X (D-23, 33) | 6/19/01 | N/A | 6/22/01 | 7/25/01 | 10/3/02 | 10/17 |
|
D-28
|
Prioritize invasive plant pest response methods needs under direction of the methods Development Director and the National Coordinator. |
DR |
X | 5/24/01 | 5/9/01 | 6/8/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/13/01 | 8/27 |
|
D-29
|
Fill key managerial and research positions in the methods development unit with highly trained, well-qualified scientists, i.e., insect pathologists and plant pathologists. |
S |
X | 10/23 | 10/18 | 10/25/00 | 11/6/00 | 11/29 | 12/14 |
|
D-30
|
Form stronger partnerships with external research agencies such as USDA-ARS and other Federal, State, and research institutions for methods development. |
ST |
X (D-30a-c, 31, 31a, b) | 3/22/02 | 4/11/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
D-30a
|
Encourage USDA-ARS, through administrative channels to conduct research that meets the practical needs of APHIS-PPQ. |
ST |
X (D-30, 30b-c, 31, 31a,b) | 3/23/02 | 4/11/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
D-30b
|
Combine relevant response activity research expertise in USDA-ARS or the Forest Service with APHIS-PPQ through relocation of work stations or interagency transfers. |
ST |
X (D-30, 30a,c,31, 31a,b) | 3/23/02 | 4/11/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
D-30c
|
Award contracts to outside entities when appropriate to secure needed expertise. |
ST |
X (D-30, 30a,b,31, 31a,b) | 3/23/02 | 4/11/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
D-31
|
Establish a liaison position within APHIS-PPQ to facilitate communication between APHIS-PPQ and USDA-ARS. |
ST |
X (D-30, 30a-c, 31a,b) | 3/23/02 | 4/11/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
D-31a
|
Reassign an existing employee with research experience and an understanding of regulatory needs to provide required expertise. |
ST |
X (D-30, 30a-c,31b) | 3/23/02 | 4/11/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
D-31b
|
Provide funds to establish cooperative arrangements with USDA-ARS staff to conduct the required research. |
ST |
X (D-30, 30a-c, 31a) | 3/23/02 | 4/11/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/1/02 | 8/26 |
| D-32 | Institute a formal peer review process for evaluation of invasive plant pest management programs. A scientific review panel composed of relevant experts from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies would provide a systematic and critical evaluation of pest management programs. For long-term programs, this scientific review should be conducted at least every 3 years. |
ST |
X | 9/30/02 | 9/30/02 | 10/02/02 Revised 12/02/02 | 8/1/03 | 10/20/03 | 11/4/03 |
|
D-33
|
Provide adequate funding for the methods development unit to enhance the unitÆs ability to conduct thorough quality control and assurance evaluation of mitigation methodologies. |
ST |
X (D-23, 27) | 6/19/01 | N/A | 6/22/01 | 7/25/01 | 10/3/02 | 10/17 |
|
D-34
|
Dedicate a position to coordinate pesticide needs with EPA, particularly as it relates to pesticide registration and the impact of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. This should be facilitated through USDAÆs Office of Pesticide Management. |
DR |
XD-35 | N/A | 10/4/00 | 9/16/01 | 10/31/01 | 11/15 | |
| D-35 | Institute an Assistant Director level employee exchange program between the APHIS-PPQ and EPA to facilitate communication between these agencies relative to the use of pesticides in plant pest and noxious weed quarantine, eradication, and management. Through this exchange, EPA would gain knowledge of the pest management challenges faced by APHIS-PPQ and APHIS-PPQ would benefit from knowledge of the pesticide registration process, labeling requirements, and tolerance reviews. The agencies should work closely in the registration of "softer" pesticides and biological control organisms. |
DR |
XD-34 | N/A | 10/4/00 | 9/16/01 | 10/31/01 | 11/15 | |
|
D-36
|
Establish a National Invasive Plant Pest Information Center (NIPP CEN) with two functional entities, the National Invasive Plant Pest Laboratory (NIPP LAB) and the National Invasive Plant Pest Database (NIPP BASE). |
TS |
X | 4/12/02 | 4/12/02 | 5/1/02 Revised 4/05 | 11/02 Revised 5/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 |
|
D-37
|
Establish the National Invasive Plant Pest Laboratory (NIPP LAB) as a "virtual" clearinghouse for specimens to be identified. Assign NIPP LAB staff primary responsibility in obtaining confirmatory identification of invasive plant pests submitted by port personnel or other agencies. Perform identifications at APHIS-PPQ or send them to external cooperators when necessary (e.g., the Systematic Entomology Laboratory, the Smithsonian Institution, university personnel). By acting as a national clearinghouse, the NIPP LAB will maintain control of and have access to information on all invasive plant pest incursions through its final identifications role. |
TS |
X (D-36, 43-46) | 4/12/02 | 4/12/02 | 6/23/00 Revised 6/22/01 Revised 5/1/02 | 11/02 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
D-38
|
Staff the National Invasive Plant Pest Laboratory with a relatively small group of professionals with expertise in entomology, botany, plant pathology, mycology, and molecular biology. Include molecular diagnostics capabilities for insects, weeds, and pathogens. |
S |
X | 8/1/00 | N/A | 8/1/00 | 9/7/00 | 11/20 | 12/4 |
|
D-39
|
Expand the video identification of plant pests to cover all ports. It is imperative that this be instituted as soon as possible to improve the efficiency of APHIS-PPQ in meetings its regulatory role. |
TS |
X | 6/30/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 7/25/01 | 8/13/01 | 8/27 | ||
|
D-40
|
Contract with external specialists through cooperative agreements to provide their services in confirming identification of species that are not readily categorized by National Invasive Plant Pest Laboratory staff. |
TS |
X(I-27) | 11/8/00 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
| D-41 | Deposit all intercepted specimens in a permanent collection within the National Invasive Plant Pest Laboratory. Preserve specimens in a manner that facilitates DNA analyses of strain differences and identification of sibling species. |
TS |
X | 3/8/02 | N/A | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
D-42
|
Develop molecular diagnostic tools for frequently introduced or difficult to identify species groups via partnerships with USDA-ARS or external researchers. |
TS |
X | 2/6/01 | 4/19/00 | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 11/29/01 | 12/13 |
|
D-43
|
Establish the National Invasive Plant Pest Database (NIPP BASE) as an integral function of the National Invasive Plant Pest Information Center. The NIPP BASE will function as an information hub. The NIPP BASE will coordinate data on all invasive plant pests identified by the National Invasive Plant Pest Laboratory, port of entry staff, cooperators on retainer, and external experts. The NIPP BASE will include links to databases of the National Agricultural Pest Information System (NAPIS) (1999), USDA Systematic Entomology Laboratory (1999), the Smithsonian Institution, U.S. Forest Service (1999), Federal Noxious Weeds Database, among others. The goal of the NIPP BASE is to provide a comprehensive and timely reporting mechanism for invasive plant pests in the United States. |
IM |
(D-36, 37, 44-46) | Revised by adding to D-36, 37 5/19/05 | 5/27/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 | ||
|
D-44
|
List all pertinent information on invasive plant pests in the National Invasive Plant Pest Database. This includes, but is Not limited to: scientific and common names, identifying characteristics with supporting graphics, point of interception and related pathway information, reproductive status, global distribution, including distribution within the United States, point of origin, pest status, biology, and known detection and control methodology. |
IM |
(D-36, 37, 43, 45, 46) | Revised by adding to D-36, 37 5/19/05 | 5/27/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 | ||
|
D-45
|
Provide access to National Invasive Plant Pest Database via the internet. Include in this database a secured input function that will allow specialists to enter identifications. Screen submitted information prior to final database entry to ensure compliance with database guidelines. Guidelines will ensure that only validated information is entered into the database. Provide public access to the database as a read-only website. |
IM |
(D-36, 37, 43, 44, 46) | Revised by adding to D-36, 37 5/19/05 | 5/27/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 | ||
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
D-46
|
Institute a computerized system, perhaps in the form of a simple e-mail group list, to notify regulatory officials and stakeholders of new invasive plant pest introductions in their regions. |
IT |
(D-36, 37, 43-45) | Revised by adding to D-36, 37 5/19/05 | 5/27/05 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 | ||
| I-1 | APHIS should decentralize the IT organizational responsibilities and personnel to programmatic areas, with management by the end-user groups. |
IT |
X (E-116, I-2, 5, 18) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02-To be revised | 3/16/04 | 3/30 |
|
I-2
|
Based on the content of this report, the Office of the Deputy Administrator of PPQ should determine what knowledge, expertise, skills and abilities are needed to lead and manage IT processes and activities. |
IT |
X (E-116, I-1, 5, 18) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02-To be revised | 3/16/04 | 3/30 |
|
I-3
|
Based on this determination of needed IT knowledge, skills and abilities, recruit and hire people who possess these qualities for IT leadership, development, and maintenance positions. |
S |
X(I-4) | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 9/16/00 | 11/20 | 12/24 |
|
I-4
|
Fill vacant positions requiring IT expertise at appropriate GS and SES levels. |
S |
X(I-3) | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 6/30/00 | 9/16/00 | 11/20 | 12/4 |
|
I-5
|
Assemble and develop an IT crisis management team whose job would be to respond to the always present unexpected. Thus, PPQ would be able to minimize the disruption of responsibilities of staff. |
IT |
X (E-116, I-1, 2, 18) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 - To be revised | 3/16/04 | 3/30 |
|
I-6
|
Develop protocols for reporting key information (such as pest risk assessments in standardized electronic formats and for the dissemination and archiving of information). Development to be accomplished by teams that include all of the information stakeholders including those outside APHIS-PPQ |
IM |
X(E 18,I-7) | 4/13/00 | 3/31/00 | 4/14/00 Revised 6/26/00 | 2/7/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
I-7
|
Take measures to assure that the needs dictate the protocols. |
IM |
X(E 18, I 6) | 4/13/00 | 3/31/00 | 4/14/00 Revised 6/26/00 | 2/7/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
I-8
|
Give high priority to adopting web-based information technologies in developing a system for managing the acquisition, analysis, dissemination, archiving, and retrieval of information relevant to exotic pests. |
IT |
(E-20; I-24, 26) | 7/5/05 | 7/13 | 7/27 | |||
| I-9 | To the maximum extent practicable, exchange information with pest, disease, and invasive species data initiatives in other agencies, including the Forest Service, the Department of the Interior (U.S. Geological Survey, the Park Service, the Bureau of Land Management), the National Biological Information Infrastructure and some state NGO efforts. |
IM |
XI-10-15 | 9/00 | 9/00 | 10/4/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 11/1/02 Revised 7/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
|
I-10
|
Develop archival databases of key information in a prioritized sequence, that are available and searchable through web-based technology. |
IM |
XI-9, 11-15 | 9/00 | 9/00 | 10/4/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 11/1/02 Revised 7/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
|
I-11
|
Maintain sensitive information on an intranet, internal to APHIS/PPQ, but much information should be repackaged for use by stakeholders, for public awareness and for international dialogue. |
IM |
XI-9, 10, 12-15 | 9/00 | 9/00 | 10/4/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 11/1/02 Revised 7/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
|
I-12
|
Assure that each database has an independent reason for existing. |
IM |
XI-9-11, 13-15 | 9/00 | 9/00 | 10/4/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 11/1/02 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
| I-13 | Assure that a strong effort is made by teams of all the stakeholders, to develop multiple and combined uses for the various databases. |
IM |
XI-9-12, 14-15 | 9/00 | 9/00 | 10/4/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 11/1/02 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
|
I-14
|
As a critical first step, catalog data resources important to PPQÆs mission in a systematic fashion, using a standard vocabulary and a web-searchable format. Thus records should at a minimum contain the "metadata" information assembled in the clearinghouse mechanisms for other U.S. Government environmental and natural resource programs. |
IM |
XI-9-13, 15 | 9/00 | 9/00 | 10/4/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 11/1/02 Revised 7/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
|
I-15
|
Assure that the content of the catalog of data resources would at least include descriptions, lead agencies, contacts, subject, geographical and methodological keywords, access instructions, and guidelines/restrictions on use. This requirement could be met in part by emulating aspects of the National Biological Information Infrastructure (http://www.nbii.gov) The Global Change Master Director (http//www.gcmd.gsfc.nasa.gov/), the Government (Global) Information Locator Service (GILSûhttp:www.gils.net) and the California Environmental Resource Evaluation System (CERES)ûhttp://www.cres.ca.gov/catalog. |
IM |
XI-9-14 | 9/00 | 9/00 | 10/4/00 Revised 6/22/01 | 11/1/02 Revised 7/05 | 7/22/05 | 8/4/05 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
I-16
|
Appoint an "Information Management Team" headed by a non-IT person in order to lead and manage the IT functions in PPQ. |
L |
X | 4/14/00 | N/A | 4/14/00 | 4/21/00 | 5/10/00 | 5/24 |
| I-17 | Allow individual locations to deal with local internet service providers and allow individual programs to justify their connectivity levels based upon identifiable needs. |
IT |
X (E-114, 115) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02-To be revised | 3/16/04 | 3/30 |
|
I-18
|
Station IT personnel at PPQ locations to meet local needs. IT specialists should be responsible to the local program leader. |
IT |
X (E-114, 115, 116, I-1,2,3,5,17) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 - To be revised | 3/16/04 | 3/30 |
|
I-19
|
Make a concerted effort to assemble and organize all available information on pests not known to occur in the United States. The first step in this process should be to develop a plan to accomplish this task and to estimate the level of effort that would be required to substantially complete this task within 5 years. |
ST |
X(I-21, 23, 44, E-44, 48) | 4/30/00 | 10/6/00 | 6/26/00 Revised 10/1/00 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
I-20
|
Concurrently acquire and assemble readily available information such as the CABI database and the commodity-related pest lists, including the corresponding bibliographic and taxonomic information that Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom seem willing to share. |
II(I-25) |
X | 6/23/00 Revised 5/1/05 | 7/9/02 Revised 6/7/05 | 6/17/05 | 7/1/05 | ||
|
I-21
|
Develop and implement a process of placing each pest not known to occur in the United States into a quarantine risk group, perhaps using the New Zealand procedure modified to meet U.S. needs. This process should result in the identification of those species that are most dangerous and that warrant special attention, and the first iteration of the process should be completed within 6 years. |
ST |
X(I-19, 23, 44, E-44, 48) | 2/26/01 | 2/26/01 | 2/26/01 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
I-22
|
PPQ and IS should undertake a significant effort in geo-referenced modeling of invasive species in general, with concurrent pattern analysis of present and future databases, particularly those with distributional and interception information. This will require an increase in dedicated personnel, with cooperation among the various Federal and State agencies responsible for the data collection and archiving. A recently developed technology, Internet Map Server, could be used to spatially represent the geographic and severity [sic] of outbreaks over the internet. |
ST |
X | 5/25/00 | 5/25/00 | 10/6/00 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
I-23
|
The PPQ and IS should develop and implement a coordinated plan to integrate the various database efforts on pests not known to occur in the United States with those of other organizations, both nationally and internationally. Thus, PPQ and IS should seek out mutually beneficial arrangements with USGS, EPA, U.S. universities, and international organizations (FAO, IPPC, etc.) |
IM |
X(I-19, 21, 44, E-44, 48) | 5/25/00 | 5/25/00 | 10/6/00 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| I-24 | Assign or hire IT personnel to participate in interagency standard-setting groups and long-term planning exercises. Particular efforts should be made to adopt standardized vocabularies (e.g., ITIS nomenclature) and data structures (for example GILS/FGCD/Z39.50 metadata specifications) as they become widely used within the Federal Government or among important collaborators. If existing personnel are assigned technical liaison and standard-setting tasks, they must be provided with matching release from other responsibilities. |
IT |
X (I-8, 26; E-20) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/5/05 | 7/13/05 | 7/27 |
| I-25 | The PPQ and IS should take advantage of opportunities to connect to international databases on species distributions. These include a number of national programs, for example, Environment Australia, http://www.biodiversity.environment.gov.au/: Base de Dados Tropical, http://www.bdt.org.br.bdt/, in Brazil; INBIO, http://www.inbio.ac.dr, in Costa Rica; and CONABIO, http://www.inbio.ac in Mexico; and several emerging international biodiversity networks, including BIN21, http://www.bdt.org.br/bin21/bin21.html, the Biodiversity Conservation Information System, http://biodiversity.org/, and MABNetAmericas, http://www.mabnetamericas.org/mabnet/home.html. All of these efforts have major emphases on non-indigenous species and are especially important in assessing threats from invasive species that already have erupted elsewhere. A particular opportunity to develop more foreign database links and standardization is in the proposal to the Inter-America Biodiversity Information Network (IABIN) to develop information sharing on invasive species (initially fish and vascular plants) among participants in the Summit of the Americas (see http://www.nbii.gov/iabin/torpilot.html). These initiatives all share a goal of using the protocols developed under the clearinghouse mechanims of the Convention on Biodiversity and are working toward common uses of biological nomenclature (see the Integrated Taxonomic Information System, http://www.itis.usda.gov/plantproj/itis/index.html.) Unless there are overwhelming reasons to do otherwise, APHIS-PPQ should participate in these efforts and adopt their clearinghouse standards and vocabulary uses for international species data. |
II |
X(I-20) | 6/23/00 - Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 Revised 6/7/05 | 6/17/05 | 7/1/05 | ||
| I-26 | Strive to play a leading role in shaping invasive species policy, since the stakes in this policy of American plant resources is immense. The PPQ can play a leading policy role only if its information systems are interoperable with the increasingly standardized approaches being adopted by standard-setting organizations and other agencies. |
IT |
X (I-8, 24; E-20) | 4/30/02 | 4/30/02 | 5/1/02 | 7/5/05 | 7/13/05 | 7/27 |
|
I-27
|
Make greater substantial use of highly competent taxonomists and systematists in a variety of institutions. |
TS |
X(D-40) | 11/5/00 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
|
I-28
|
Take measures to assure that the extramural specialists engaged by PPQ for making identifications are involved as appropriate in the work of the New Pest Advisory Group and are kept informed of any actions taken against those dangerous exotic pests that come under the purview of the extramural specialist. |
TS |
X | 2/12/01 Revised 6/22/01 | 7/31/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28 | ||
|
I-29
|
Assure that each area identifier is trained and tested by one or more taxonomists/systematists who are recognized authorities on the taxa assigned to the Area Identifier. |
ED |
X(OA-18, 21, 60, E-72, 120, I-36, P-17) | 2/15/01 Revised & expanded | 2/15/01 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 | ||
|
I-30
|
Assure that the identification authority of all identifiers is renewed at appropriate intervals (normally every 3rd year and never less frequently than at 5 year intervals). |
TS |
X | 12/14/01 | 1/6/02 | 1/25/02 | 2/8/02 | ||
|
I-31
|
Take concrete measures to foster a strong sense of collegiality between and among area identifiers and taxonomists/ systematists in other organizations. |
TS |
X | 6/20/00 | 11/6/00 | 12/19 | 1/2/01 | ||
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
I-32
|
Examine all the workspaces assigned to area identifers and specialists and correct deficiencies with respect to safety, ergonomics, and the special requirements of the assignment. |
TS |
X(I-33-34) | 10/2 | 10/2 | 10/25 | 11/6/00 | 12/19 | 1/2/01 |
|
I-33
|
Examine the needs of area identifiers and specialists with respect to instrumentation and equipment and correct all deficiencies. |
TS |
X(I-32, 34) | 6/19/00 | 6/19/00 | 6/20/00 | 11/6/00 | 12/19 | 1/2/01 |
|
I-34
|
Examine the needs of area identifiers and specialists with respect to technical literature, information on CD-ROM or available on the internet and correct all deficiencies. |
TS |
X(I-32-33) | 10/2 | 10/2 | 10/25/00 | 11/6/00 | 12/19 | 1/2/01 |
|
I-35
|
Examine the needs of area identifiers and specialists with respect to professional development, advancement, and retention and devise a system of continuing education and earned promotion to assure that capable identifiers are advanced and rewarded to the same extent as are those who take other career pathways in PPQ. |
TS |
X | 6/11/01 | N/A | 8/29/01 Revised 7/16/05 | 7/18/05 | 7/26/05 | 8/10 |
| I-36 | As prerequisites to serving as a seed inspector, give each prospective inspector several hours of seed biology training and test the prospect with respect to reliability of ability to identify important weed taxa in the seed stage. Subsequently, PPQ should require each inspector to take advantage of periodic retraining opportunities. |
ED |
X(OA-18, 21, 60, E-72, 120, I-29, P-17) | 2/15/01 Revised & expanded | 2/15/01 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 | ||
|
I-37
|
Hire additional national weed seed identifiers to decrease the backlog of current plant seed samples and to process the taxonomic identification of samples of plant seeds in a more timely manner in the future. |
TS |
X | 6/20/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 | ||
|
I-38
|
Engage the assistance of international plant taxonomists with weed seed expertise more often. With remote imaging technology, a system could be implemented that would allow foreign biologists to quickly identify the taxa of seeds of their native species, with U.S. seed biologists reciprocating when needed. |
TS |
X | 5/16/00 | N/A | 6/20/00 | 11/6/00 | 11/29 | 12/14 |
|
I-39
|
Appoint an international pest information officer whose primary responsibility would be to develop and lead a program on the systematic collection and discovery of intelligence on pests not known to occur in the United States. This officer should report to both the Deputy Administrator for International Services and the Deputy Administrator for PPQ. |
II |
X | 4/30/02 | N/A | 6/30/00 revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 6/7/05 | 6/21 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
I-40
|
The PPQ and IS should appoint a standing committee on the collection and use of intelligence on exotic pests. The National Plant Pest Coordinator will be a permanent member of this standing committee. This committee should report to the international pest information officer whenever appropriate but no less than two times per year. Specifically, the committee should do the following: ò Develop a description of current programmatic uses of biological information.ò Consult with a representative subset of biological information users to determine their desired or optimum day-to-day information needs.ò Identify and describe additional resources needed to achieve optimal biological information that can be acquired, analyzed, and reported in an effective manner.ò Identify mechanisms to provide analyses of data and subsequent means to disseminate to targeted information users. Designated scientists or experts must have the responsibility to provide both general and specific views of the exotic pest issue and construct short- to long-range radar for anticipated exotic pests.ò Present a written recommendation to a larger review group of biological information users to ensure an accurate capture of the biological information needs.ò Deliver a report containing recommendations to program applicators and policy-makers for implementaiton.ò Review status of recommendations made previously.ò Resurvey biological information users to determine current needs and future needs.ò Prepare and deliver a report containing findings and recommendations to program applicators and policy makers for implementation. |
II |
X(I 41, 42) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 Revised 6/22/01 Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 5/2/05 | 5/17 | |
|
I-41
|
The standing committee shall include on representative each from (a) Office of the Deputy Administrator for PPQ, (b) Office of Deputy Administrator for International Services, (c) Center for Plant Health Science and Technology, (d) NPAG, (e) Biotechnology and Biological Analysis, (f) national identifiers, (g) APHIS library, (h) Phytosanitary Issues management, (i) National Biological Control Institute, (j) Port Information Network, (k) one liaison officer from the North American Biodiversity Information Network, (l) one liaison officer each from ARS, FS, CSREES, and FAS, and (m) others as deemed necessary by the Deputy Administrator of PPQ. |
II |
X(I 40, 42) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 Revised 6/22/01 Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 5/2/05 | 5/17 | |
|
I-42
|
The APHIS should create a mechanism whereby IS and PPQ will work together with the standing committee on the collection and use of intelligence on exotic pests in setting priorities, defining protocols, providing training, etc. for such a global exotic pest surveillance program. |
II |
X(I 40, 41) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 Revised 6/22/01 Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 5/2/05 | 5/17 | |
|
I-43
|
The IS and PPQ should develop a global program to monitor the movements of especially dangerous pests. The APHIS should develop comprehensive systematic programs of pest-intelligence gathering especially, but not exclusively for the Caribbean, Mexico, and Central America and Canada with defined protocols and an accessible database for storage, sharing, and analysis of the information collected. |
II |
X | 4/30/02 | N/A | 5/1/02 | |||
|
I-44
|
Update the various lists of classes of exotic plant pests (arthropods, plant pathogens, molluscs, weeds, etc.). The taxa in each list should be placed in a rank order from most threatening to least threatening. Such rankings should be done at 3- to 5-year intervals in cooperation with representatives of professional societies, the Agricultural Research Service, State Departments of Agriculture, CICP, FAO, etc. These ranked lists of exotic pests should be used to identify those taxa that should be targeted for (a) special exclusion efforts, (b) special surveillance abroad, and (c) R&D. |
ST |
X(I-19, 21, 23, 44, E-44, 48) | 2/26/01 | 2/26/01 | 2/26/01 | 2/27/01 | 5/29/01 | 6/12 |
| I-45 | The PPQ and IS should engage statisticians to construct improved sampling schemes for detecting and monitoring targeted pest species. Detection rates are likely to be a function of the pest population densities in the areas from which commodities are exported to the U.S., the opportunities for the pest to follow a pathway into the U.S., etc. Statisticians should be able to generate detection probability functions based on various sampling schemes. |
ST |
X | 12/7/01 | N/A | 5/1/02 | 9/22/03 | 10/21 | 11/4/03 |
|
I-46
|
The APHIS should also employ ancillary approaches to obtaining data on exotic pests by working cooperatively with international organizations. One approach would be to provide small grants to foreign scientists who are appropriately located to conduct surveys and studies. In addition, small grants could be made to university faculty, and other U.S. scientists who are already engaged in international programs. In any case, the latter should be queried periodically concerning new observations on exotic pests. |
II |
X(OA 58, I 47, 48) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 4/14/05 | 4/28 | |
|
I-47
|
The IS or PPQ should negotiate with each regional plant protection organization (RPPO) on the possibility of assigning a representative or liaison officer to each RPPOÆs working group on emerging pests or its equivalent. |
II |
X(OA 58, I 46, 48) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 4/14/05 | 4/28 | |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
I-48
|
The PPQ and IS should develop mechanisms to glean information on exotic pests from programs of USAID, CGIAR, FAO, IAEA, UNDP, UNEP, and other international organizations and bodies. |
II |
X(OA 58, I 46, 47) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 4/14/05 | 4/28 | |
|
I-49
|
Glean information on the capacity of various taxa to penetrate the U.S. safeguarding system. A good basis for such analysis is the review of annual interceptions of specific invasive species at ports of entry. An indicator of capacity of a given taxon to penetrate the safeguards is the length of time elapsed from the first interception to the time that the pest was first documented to occur in the United States. |
ST |
X | 5/25/00 | 5/25/00 | 10/6/00 | 2/27/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28 |
| I-50 | Each year PPQ and IS should develop a list of research needs on invasive organisms not known to occur in the U.S., and that may have the potential to be significantly destructive if they were to gain entry and become established. This list of needs should be formally transmitted to ARS, CSREES, ERS, and FAS, as appropriate. Similarly, those research needs pertaining to invasive pests that have gained footholds in the U.S. and that may be candidates for eradication or other regulatory action should be communicated to the appropriate sister research agencies. |
ST |
X | 12/18/02 | N/A | 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
| I-51 | In order to leverage the resources of sister USDA research agencies, APHIS during the course of annual budget development should identify the need for a dedicated extramural research fund of no less than $2 million recurring annually. These funds should be allocated and managed based on guidance from the standing committee on the collection and use of intelligence on exotic pests (I-38). |
ST |
X | 4/14/00 | 4/14/00 | 5/8/00 Revised 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
|
I-52
|
At the beginning of each fiscal year, APHIS should submit a comprehensive report to the National Plant Board and to other stakeholders on (1) the research projects being conducted on invasive pests in relation to the needs defined by APHIS, (2) the most important needs on which little or no research is being conducted, and (3) a summary of communications that APHIS has had with its sister USDA agencies concerning research needs relevant to invasive plant pests. |
ST |
X | 10/9/01 | N/A | 5/1/02 | 7/9/02 | 8/12/02 | 8/26 |
| I-53 | As a prudent measure, conduct or require others to conduct monitoring and surveillance of genetically modified organisms for gene transfer to crops and weeds, and new pests and pathogens not previously detected to affect the parent plant. These actions can be taken in conjunction and cooperation with States, crop consultants, university personnel domestically and in other countries. |
RM |
X | 4/16/02 | 4/16/02 | 5/1/02 | 11/03 | 11/03 | 11/24 |
| I-54 | Assemble a database that specifically includes categories for GMOÆs. Such a database is likely to be helpful in formulating policy, dealing with trading partners, and instilling confidence in consumers and buyers whether domestic or foreign. A sunset clause in such a database may be appropriate if no problems are forthcoming, e.g., over the next decade, beyond those seen with non-GMO Æs. |
IM |
X | 6/22/01 | 3/5/05 | 3/28/05 | 4/11 | ||
|
P-1
|
Combine the present two organizational structures within Scientific Services Unit under one Assistant Director. Such restructuring will eliminate personnel fragmentation and provide for efficient use of staff. |
L |
X | 2/7/01 | N/A | 2/7/01 | 3/1/01 | 3/7/01 | 3/21 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| P-2 | Develop standard practice guidelines for the various types of permitted materials. These guidelines should provide for greater permit recipient involvement, responsibility, and awareness. They should allow a risk appropriate level of flexibility in the manner of performance standards. |
P |
(P-3, 7) | N/A | 7/04 | 7/04 | 8/17/04 | 8/31 | |
| P-3 | Initiate expanded use of compliance agreements, memoranda of understanding, or other legally binding documents with industry, research and educational institutions to reduce the number of permits issued/needed. |
P |
(P-2,7) | N/A | 7/04 | 7/04 | 8/17/04 | 8/31 | |
| P-4 | Institute a system to review permitted activities to ensure compliance with permit conditions, including verification of identification of imported material and final disposition of the permitted materials. |
P |
(P-8) | N/A | 7/04 | 7/04 | 8/17/04 | 8/31 | |
|
P-5
|
Civil penalties for permit violations need to be uniformly and fairly assessed in respect to the nature of the violation. The cost of civil penalties should be increased to encourage compliance. Penalties should be vigorously pursued when appropriate for intentional permit violations. |
CP |
X(OA 37, OA 57, E 5E 118, E 119) | 4/3/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/14/00 | 7/6/00 | 8/30/00 | 9/15 |
| P-6 | Bring into concordance with similar condition requirements and performance standards, those organisms covered by both PPQ biotechnology regulations and NIH Guidelines for Research and Recombinant DNA Containing Organisms. |
P |
N/A | 6/21/05 | 6/27/05 | 7/5/05 | 7/19 | ||
| P-7 | Modify containment requirements for organisms, being imported under the authorization of plant pest permits to be made consistent with the level of pest risk. |
P |
(P-2,3) | N/A | 7/04 | 7/04 | 8/17/04 | 8/31 | |
| P-8 | Develop procedures that will include complete identification information of the plant materials in each shipment in/with the post-entry quarantine paperwork for arrival notification, which is used to track the materials during the quarantine period. |
P |
(P-4) | N/A | 7/04 | 7/04 | 8/17/04 | 8/31 | |
|
P-9
|
Initiate a conscientious effort to stabilize headquarters and port staff rotation as necessary to maximize permit system effectiveness and to make staff policies consistent. |
S |
X | 9/27/00 | N/A | 10/3/00 | 3/1/01 | 3/19/01 | 4/2/01 |
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
|
P-10
|
Develop an external feedback/communications mechanism for stakeholders to advise the permit unit of concerns, provide scientific input, or suggestions for improvements. |
SC |
X | 4/17/00 | 3/21/00 | 6/20/00 | 2/27/01 | 9/11/01 | 9/15 |
| P-11 | Develop a strategic plan that will assure uniformity within the permit unit providing for its mission, goals, objectives, policy, and operational standards. The plan should focus permit system emphasis where risks to agriculture and the environment are the greatest. |
P |
X (P-18) | N/A | 3/6/01 Revised 6/22/01 | 7/04 | 7/04 | 8/17 | |
|
P-12
|
Develop with a sense of urgency, an electronic database for permit status, tracking, and permit/entry requirements for both propagative and non-propagative materials. If necessary to expedite the development of these databases, contracting with an outside entity is advised. |
IT |
X (P-19, 20) | 4/11/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/21/00 | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
| P-13 | Incorporate new technologies into the permit systemÆs inspection and monitoring programs to improve effectiveness, reduce quarantine time periods, reduce costs, and provide for better utilization of personnel. For example, under post-entry quarantine permit procedures, plants are inspected for specific diseases usually for a 2-year period. Testing methods such as ELISa could be employed to test the plant materials, which make it possible to eliminate or shorten the post-entry inspections and quarantine period. Using sound newer technologies and monitoring procedures should reduce costs and utilize personnel in a more efficient manner. |
ST |
(E-47, 91) | 1/28/03 | N/A | 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |
|
P-14
|
Develop an education and training program for permit system personnel, cooperators, industry researchers, educators, students and the general public. Documents about importation requirements, distributed both with permits and as general informational, should be made more user friendly and should be specific to the types of material to be imported. |
PI/E |
X(OA 48-56, E 69-70) | 4/19/00 | 3/3/00 | 6/26/00 Expanded | 7/17/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 |
| P-15 | Conduct an annual or biannual review of the permit system utilizing a committee of Federal, State, university, and industry representatives. With the changing world and national pest risk conditions, the development of rapid communication capabilities and the development of new technologies, the permit system should be flexible and dynamic. |
SC |
X | 4/17/00 | N/A | 6/20/00 Revised 3/15/03 | 9/22/03 | 4/18/05 | 5/1 |
| P-16 | Amend regulations that will promote the use of Departmental permits to allow appropriate facilities to import plants in response to industry needs while maintaining necessary safeguards. Departmental permits as they are currently being issued are not always legally defensible under existing regulations. |
A |
X | 2/9/01 | 2/8/01 | 2/12/01 Revised 6/22/01 | 6/22/05 | 7/5/05 | 7/19 |
| P-17 | Provide continuing education and training to maintain or improve PPQ permit system personnel competency. |
ED |
X(OA-18, 21, 60, E-72, 120, I-29, 36) | 2/15/01 Revised & expanded | 2/15/01 | 5/16/02 | 5/30 | ||
|
Section/ Number |
Recommendation |
Issue Group |
Plan Drafted (Part of Same Action Plan) |
Peer Review Done (Date) |
Linkage Review Done (Date) |
To Steering Committee (Date) |
To PPQ Management Team (Date) |
Posted on Web (Date) |
Final (Date) |
| P-18 | Timeframes for issuance of permits must be reduced. Organizational standards should include specific timeframes for review and issuance of each type of permit. |
P |
X (P-11) | N/A | 3/6/01 Revised 6/22/01 | 7/04 | 8/17/04 | 8/31 | |
|
P-19
|
Develop an electronic or "paperless" system that should be incorporated into an electronic database. Such system would expedite the issuance of permits and improve efficiency of the permit unit. |
IT |
X(P-12, 20) | 4/11/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/21/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 | |
|
P-20
|
Develop and maintain a documentation system as needed to support the denial or revocation of permits. The permit system database should include information regarding permit denials or revocations and this information should be made available for use by Federal and State inspectors. |
IMIT |
X(P-12, 19) | 4/11/00 | 4/3/00 | 4/21/00 | 10/17 | 11/6 | |
| P-21 | Apply the permit system to mitigate all invasive pest risks associated with the importation of seeds. |
P |
N/A | 7/04 | 7/04 | 8/17/04 | 8/31 | ||
| P-22 | Discontinue the requirements for Federal permits for interstate movement of plant pests, except those under Federal quarantine because they are not known to occur or are of very limited distribution in the United States. This will have to be reconciled with the fact that some States have mandatory plant pest permit requirements. |
SC |
X | 4/17/00 | N/A | 6/23/00 | 6/24 | 7/8/05 | 7/22 |
| P-23 | Discontinue the issuance of Quarantine 56 permits for admissible materials that do not have exceptionally unusual specific requirements. |
RA |
X | 3/13/00 | 3/13/00 | 4/10/00 | 6/28/00 Resubmitted 2/27/01 | 8/14/01 | 8/28 Dropped per Executive Team after additional review |
|
P-24
|
Develop a list of invasive plant species that, in addition to those listed in the Federal Noxious Weed Act, would be restricted through permit requirements. This list should be developed in cooperation with and using expertise of the States, weed science and environmental organizations, universities, and industry. |
ST |
X | 10/2/02 | N/A | 10/02 Revised 3/1/03 | 9/22/03 | 10/7/03 | 10/21 |